Friday, February 21, 2020
Analysis of the Film The Wizard of Oz (1939) Movie Review
Analysis of the Film The Wizard of Oz (1939) - Movie Review Example With reference to the more obvious part of the subject, the filmmaker appears to enthuse lifeââ¬â¢s constant fact that by oneââ¬â¢s sole endeavor, it would be difficult to attain a sense of fulfillment. In the story, Dorothy meets a Scarecrow, a Tin Man, and a Cowardly Lion on her journey to the Emerald City. Though each of these creatures differs greatly from each other with respect to non-human material characteristics, altogether they possess distinct human traits that complement those of the Kansas girl. Under these circumstances, the four become great friends as they inevitably give one another a hand in overcoming the obstacles encountered. At this stage, the film clearly inculcates to the psyche the significance of friendship that works in good and bad times alike. ââ¬ËThe Wizard of Ozââ¬â¢ specifically promotes the notion that regardless of the predictive capability of an individual to emerge as a hero or heroine in most cases like Dorothy, there comes a turning p oint when companions are amply necessitated in completing not only the set tasks or mission but also the state of happiness in all sorts of adventures experienced. On the other hand, through in-depth examination, the creation of ââ¬ËThe Wizard of Ozââ¬â¢ may be found to form an argument that suggests typical culture and ââ¬Ëpopulist ideologyââ¬â¢. By presenting the rural conditions of an American small town where the tending farm is the chief source of livelihood, the film communicates the value of familial ties and associated hard-work thereof. It seeks to establish agreement to the type of American society during the 1930s when the extended period of industrialization from the Gilded Age brought about several revolutionary ideas which took effect via the outcomes perceived in the drastic change in both the economy and the general community lifestyle. In particular, the ââ¬Ëyellow brick roadââ¬â¢ which symbolizes ââ¬Ëgoldââ¬â¢ and the rainbowââ¬â¢s end bearing a ââ¬Ëpot of goldââ¬â¢ both represent the principle of prosperity which can only be achieved through enthusiastic attitude toward work while holding ââ¬Ëfamilyââ¬â¢ essential in the process. It stresses consideration to how the strength of family bond impacts
Wednesday, February 5, 2020
Concidering Aristo Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 1
Concidering Aristo - Essay Example Aristotle also opined that a hero must have a tragic flaw as this is what shows that he is not only a true human but also a true tragic hero. Oedipusââ¬â¢ tragic flaw was seen when he experienced a change of fortune from good to bad (Meyer & Downs 1535-1537). Oedipus was a king that was destroyed after the people learnt that he killed his own father and married his own mother and this was Oedipusââ¬â¢ tragic flaw. These are the qualities that Oedipus possesses and makes him qualified to be called a good but flawed king. It is therefore not wrong to classify Oedipus as a true tragic hero going by Aristotleââ¬â¢s notion that a true tragic hero must be a good man that also has his own flaws (Meyer & Downs). Oedipus played his role as a king effectively and appropriately and proved that he was appropriate for his position. Oedipusââ¬â¢ pride and arrogance is something that is typical of kings as they try to show that they are in control and the fact that Oedipus had this attribute is a pointer that he was appropriate for his position in life. If there is any attribute that should be appreciated in Oedipus, it is his self-confidence (Meyer & Downs 1532-1535). Oedipusââ¬â¢ confidence was seen when he summoned courage to solve the puzzle of the Sphinx in spite of the Sphinxââ¬â¢s threat to kill anybody that failed the puzzle. The fact that Oedipus summoned enough courage to stand up to the challenge of the Sphinx showed that he was a man that played his role as the king perfectly as he led by example. Oedipus was a courageous man that had confidence in himself and this is what makes people believe that he was arrogant. It is expected that a king should be unyielding and rigid as t hese are the true hallmarks of a great leader and the fact that Oedipus possesses these great qualities is an indication that he was a great king that could take decisions on his own without regretting them. This shows that Oedipus was a true tragic hero as he
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)